Let's Go Viking!

Free Speech Free Mind Free Will
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

Montana Strawbale Test Drive

Wow....a few days in Northern Montana in an off-grid is simply incredible! It was quite, cool (68F when it was 98F outside!) and we had everything we needed...all off-grid. Check out our site for the details!

It even inspired us to start our own addition with strawbale!

Cheers!

Saturday, February 25, 2006

It's been awhile since I last posted, but my project in Houston is operational and the new ones are in progress, so life's been good.
I have to weigh in on portgate, the very idea that US ports would be managed by oversea concerns is very troubling to me.  But rather than jump on the anti-Bush bandwagon, I would like to see a very in-depth investigation of this transaction, including the question of why the Whitehouse tried to slip this by the American people and the President's strong stance in support of it.  I don't want this issue to go away until we have full disclosure of the issue and know all the details. I want public, non-partisian hearings and a full accounting of the details leading up to the deal and the White House's reaction to it. I want to know who knew what and when, and exactly what kind of investigation Homeland Security performed. Then and only then should the people be allowed to vote on it. Then it can go away.

Thursday, November 10, 2005

A Question of Rights

It came up in conversation today about rights and the limit of rights.  A few of my colleagues think that rights are unlimited and may be expressed at will. I hold that people have only three rights from birth, the right to life, the right to freedom, and the right to pursue happiness.  Any other rights are the benefit of the government under which you live. They may be revoked by that government. These rights are also not available to non-citizens even though they may reside under the jurisdiction of that government.  Should a government grant all people the same rights and privileges as  its citizens, then the value of citizenship is diluted leaving the citizens to question why they possess the burden of responsibilities and no additional rights. But I digress and will discuss the dilution of citizenship later.

As I go about my life, I have the right to do damn near anything that I want.  That does not mean that I do anywhere close to the things that I can…common sense, courtesy (look it up if you don’t know what that means) and respect for the rights of others all weight in on my decisions. What gets my hackles up is when someone insists that they have the right to do something that interferes with my rights, and then scream that I am denying them their rights if I complain to them. Whose rights take precedent?   This is a question I ponder daily. Let me know if you have the answer.

I’ll continue this discussion tomorrow …


Hoskald Asgeirsson
Posted by Picasa

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Cordwood and an American Individual

Thinking of individuals in America and having been raised to be a rampant individualist (Edward Abbey is my hero) I must give a mention to DayCreek. I have watched this site grow over the past few years as I have watched Alan’s house grow. It’s not flashy “green-tech” or some kind of political grandstanding.  It’s just one guy who decided he wanted a home for his wife and him at retirement. He didn’t want to depend on the outside world to provide for him or his wife for basics of life and he wanted to have fun doing it.  And that is just what he has done.

The home is a double-walled cordwood structure, two stories and roughly 2,000 square feet. It uses passive/active solar heating, grid-tied solar electric and a slew of interesting gadgets, most of which Alan designed and built. The house is almost complete now. 61 full walls are complete with only one to go.  I started watching this when he only had 5 walls up.  What an adventure!

He has a great writing style, a wry sense of humor and tons of great information about cordwood building. If you are interested in this style then also check out Rob Roy of New York, one of the leading pioneers in this technique.

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Let's Go Viking Explained

Why is my Blogg called “Let’s Go Viking” then have the First Amendment quoted underneath? It’s due to the fact that in my research it appears that the Icelanders, during the settlement period, had what is probably the most efficient Democracy, having a nation controlled by the Rule of Law, with no executive branch and no Head of State. It lasted for roughly 300 years, from 912 C.E. – 1200 C.E. when Denmark used a civil war as an excuse to invade and place Iceland under Danish rule.  They placed a great emphasis on individual responsibility which I find sorely lacking in modern America.
I think that we in the United States could learn a great deal from the history of Iceland (relearn actually since much of our legal system is directly descended from the Icelanders).

I hope that in the entries to come to explore the political landscape and provide food for thought for the coming 2008 elections. Since I am politically independent I have no agenda and no party affiliations, I hope to provide some rational commentary.

Thursday, November 03, 2005

OnLine First Amendment Bill Defeated

Today was not a good day for free speech online. The US House defeated HB H.R. 1606 that would remove restrictions placed on online speech by the Federal Elections Commission in 2002 in an effort to control "soft money" (good thing - Ed.Note). The result is Federal Control over on-line, political speech (bad thing -Ed.Note). Political comments now face certain restrictions (see http://www.fec.gov ) that in short make it almost impossible for an individual to freely comment on elections, or elected officals due to the everchanging reporting requirements.

From the ">First Amendment Center "The House voted 225-182 for H.R 1606, which would have excluded blogs, e-mails and other Internet communications from regulation by the Federal Election Commission. That was 47 votes short of the two-thirds majority needed under a procedure that limited debate time and allowed no amendments."

Looking at the Roll Call Vote from the House of Representitives (Roll Call Vote 559) the following Representitives voted to Pass (this mean not send the Bill on for consideration) and fail the bill:
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Baca
Bachus
Baker
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Beauprez
Berman
Biggert
Bilirakis
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Blunt
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Bono
Boozman
Boren
Boucher
Boustany
Brady (TX)
Brown (OH)
Brown (SC)
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Cannon
Cantor
Capito
Capuano
Cardoza
Carter
Chabot
Chandler
Chocola
Clay
Cole (OK)
Conaway
Conyers
Costa
Cramer
Crenshaw
Cuellar
Culberson
Cunningham
Davis (KY)
Davis (TN)
Davis, Jo Ann
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
DeLay
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Doolittle
Drake
Dreier
Duncan
Ehlers
English (PA)
Eshoo
Everett
Fattah
Feeney
Ferguson
Fitzpatrick (PA)
Flake
Foley
Forbes
Fortenberry
Fossella
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Gibbons
Gingrey
Gohmert
Goode
Goodlatte
Granger
Graves
Green (WI)
Gutknecht
Harris
Hart
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hensarling
Herger
Herseth
Hoekstra
Honda
Hostettler
Hoyer
Hulshof
Hunter
Inglis (SC)
Issa
Istook
Jenkins
Jindal
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Keller
Kelly
Kennedy (MN)
Kennedy (RI)
Kind
King (IA)
Kingston
Kline
Knollenberg
Kolbe
Kuhl (NY)
Latham
Lee
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lofgren, Zoe
Lucas
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Matheson
McCaul (TX)
McCotter
McCrery
McHenry
McHugh
McKeon
McKinney
McMorris
Melancon
Mica
Miller (MI)
Miller, Gary
Moran (KS)
Murphy
Murtha
Musgrave
Myrick
Neugebauer
Ney
Northup
Nunes
Nussle
Otter
Paul
Pence
Peterson (MN)
Peterson (PA)
Pickering
Pitts
Poe
Porter
Price (GA)
Putnam
Rahall
Rehberg
Reichert
Renzi
Reynolds
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Ross
Royce
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Salazar
Sanchez, Loretta
Scott (GA)
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Sessions
Shadegg
Shaw
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shuster
Simpson
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Sodrel
Souder
Stearns
Strickland
Sullivan
Sweeney
Tancredo
Taylor (NC)
Terry
Thomas
Thompson (CA)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Udall (CO)
Waters
Watson
Weldon (FL)
Weller
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (SC)
Woolsey
Wynn
Young (FL)

In my opinion this is completely unacceptable behavior from the House. If your Representitive is on this list, call, fax, or email then today! Rep Jeb Hensarling will be attempting to reintroduce this bill before the session ends.